Chip, Chip, Chip . . . Nudge, Nudge, Nudge . . . The Dismantling of The United States Of America . . .

Do you know how it is being done?

Do you even know who is doing it?

This last week on the cable TV channels here at the RV Park where we are staying there were two programs that ran in Prime Time.  These programs were named “The crumbling of America” and “Racism in America, a story of hatred” . . .

Both programs portrayed the United States as decadent and racist.  I must admit to all of you that I did not watch the entire program of either one.  Why? I felt my anger rising to the boiling point after just the first few minutes of each one of them and I just turned them off.

Needless to say, I am very proud of what my country represents, especially since I have personally observed how people in other countries are treated by their respective governments.  We have come a very long way since this country was founded, and I do not like the direction where the currant group of politicians are now taking this once great country.

Over the span of my short life I have watched certain things that were once considered basic liberties being removed from us, little bit by little bit.  Only recently have I been able to see just who is behind it all, but I still do not have a case that I could take to court.

During the last few Presidential campaigns I have begun to notice that the mainstream news media (MSM) have been favoring only one type of political candidate over all others.  And what is worse is that they have lied about who actually supports those candidates and how much support they are given.  Only the candidates who advocate much more governmental control and higher taxes are recognized by the MSM far over anyone else, regardless of what the consensus of public opinion may be.  That was so glaringly evident during this last election I am surprised that no one else noticed.

On the Republican side, McCain was favored over Duncan Hunter even though Hunter was a very strong National Security advocate who wanted to seal our borders and round up all the illegal aliens and send them back to where they came from.  McCain does not want to seal our borders, nor return illegals to their own countries.  Not a good thing security wise, yet McCain drew the MSM support for his party over all others.

On the Democrat side, Obama drew the MSM support at the end over Hillary Clinton for no other reason than he advocated much more of governmental controls over the population than she did.

Way back when Goldwater was running against LBJ, the MSM portrayed Goldwater as a war monger who would send us into WW3 in a heartbeat and LBJ as the peace lover type.  After he was elected, LBJ took us headlong into Viet Nam with the MSM’s blessings.

Do you see the trend here?

Over the years I have seen the MSM push for things like abortion by reporting on just the evils of illegal abortions and not telling the entire truth that on the whole picture illegal abortions were seldom performed on a national scale, but they got it pushed through anyway.

Then they began chipping away at our children and their parents by advocating “an even playing field in the school grading system” and campaigning to have parents arrested for punishing their children.

By taking away the parental tools you separate parents from children and put the children under more governmental control and less under the parents control.  By leveling the grading system in the children's education you remove the drive for competition from the student thereby making that individual more susceptible to even more governmental controls.

Removing the right to own and bear firearms with more and more restrictive gun controls by blaming all crime on firearm owners, you remove the sense of personal responsibility and the ability to protect and provide for ones self and ones family thereby making that individual more and more dependant upon the government for personal protection.

Now the MSM is advocating for “free” governmental health care, completing the dependency from cradle to the grave.  Yes, that is right, with governmental health care the government will eventually decide when your life is no longer worth living.

Don’t believe me?

Just look at the past and see for yourself just who controls your MSM and what the MSM has advocated over the past one hundred years.

I don’t know about you, but I for one do not like what our so-called “free” press is advocating.  I do not like the way that the MSM has been ignoring the great majority of the population, nor how it is ignoring the reality of the lying so-called scientists who have pushed the very convenient lie about global climate change – notice how the MSM changed that from the late 1960’s global cooling to the 1980’s global warming to now it is global climate change? – and for the implementation of the cap & trade rules and regulations.

For decades the MSM has been touting the evils of gun ownership by listing how many people die each year from firearms while ignoring the fact that almost ten times that many die from automobile wrecks.  While pushing for more and more gun regulations and bans, the MSM has ignored the fact that criminals just do not care about gun laws and will obtain a gun any way they can.  Murderers kill with whatever they can and not just guns, yet gun deaths are championed by every law enforcement reality TV shows like “The First 48” and “Crime 360” while ignoring all other forms that murderers use.

This trend to shape public opinion has been going on since I was a child of four years old.  That is right, I was reading newspaper stories at the age of four when I first learned to read.  The newspaper was for a very long time my only form of entertainment as we did not have a radio (that was before TV’s were affordable and popular).

I ask the reader to please do the research and find out for yourself.  I used to inhabit library’s on a weekly basis and I now use this wonderful communicative tool called the Internet to do my research on.  I do not list the web sites on purpose as I want the reader to explore on his/her own and see what else they can find.  I want the reader to think for yourself, so please do not take my word for this – get out there and find out for your self.

Trying something from “PollDaddy” . . . if this works, it will expire in one week from today.

<script type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8" src="http://static.polldaddy.com/p/2335908.js"></script><noscript>
<a href="http://answers.polldaddy.com/poll/2335908/">Do you think that President Obama's Afghanistan policy will succeed or fail?</a><span style="font-size:9px;">(<a href="http://www.polldaddy.com">online surveys</a>)</span>
</noscript>

From the Fox News Website – As I have said before this global warming stuff has all been one big scam!

Global Warming Scandal Makes Scientific Progress More Difficult, Experts Say

Tuesday, December 01, 2009
By Gene J. Koprowski

• Print
• ShareThis

AP

A flock of geese fly past a smokestack at a Kansan coal power plant

The trustworthiness of the scientific community's global warming data pool is being called into question as the scandal over doctored data continues to unfold.

The latest revelation came on Sunday with the publication of a report by The Sunday Times of London that scientists at the University of East Anglia’s Climate Research Unit in the United Kingdom confessed to throwing out most of the raw temperature data on which the theory of global warming is founded.

The loss of the data prevents other scientists from checking it to determine whether, in fact, there has been a long-term rise in global temperatures during the past century and a half.

"They are making scientific progress more difficult now," says Willie Soon, a physicist, astronomer and climate researcher at the solar and stellar physics division of the Harvard University-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics. "This is a shameful, dark day for science," he said in an interview with FoxNews.com.

Soon also suggested that there has been systemic suppression of dissenting opinion among scientists in the climate change community, ranging from social snubs to e-mail stalking and even threats of harm.

Many in the environmental policy community are outraged about the disclosure that the data has been lost. "The scientific process has become so appallingly corrupted," James M. Taylor, senior fellow in environment policy at The Heartland Institute, told FoxNews.com.

Heartland is a libertarian think tank in Chicago that recently produced a conference featuring scientists and policymakers, like Jose Maria Aznar, the former prime minister of Spain, and Vaclev Klaus, the president of the Czech Republic, who dispute the theory of global warming.

The report in the Times quoted Roger Pielke, a professor of environmental studies at the University of Colorado, who requested the original records from CRU.

Related Stories

• Climate Change Scientists Admit Dumping Data
• Climate Skeptics See 'Smoking Gun' in Researchers' Leaked E-Mails
• California Releases Rules for Cap-and-Trade Plan
• Greenhouse Gases at Highest Level Ever

"The CRU is basically saying, ‘Trust us.' So much for settling questions and resolving debates with science," Pielke told the Times. He did not return repeated phone calls seeking additional comment. The university’s publicist also was unable to answer additional questions about the story.

"This closed-door conspiracy is harming everyone," says Soon. "I thought I had seen it all. Now I have."

A back story is also starting to emerge, depicting a rough world of suppression of dissenting opinion. Soon, who has been involved in climate change research for 15 years and has published in the field, said there was a general consensus that global warming was possible in the late 1990s. But at the time, the research community wanted to look back not just 150 years but 1,000 years, to see what the long-term trends had been.

Soon says some scientists became staunch advocates for their position that global warming was occurring, and that they they dug in and started refusing to publish papers with contradictory viewpoints.

"I read a paper on increasing heat in the ocean and asked the scientist in France for the backup data," Soon says. "She told me she did not distribute data to people who didn't agree with her conclusions."

Soon says he has been victimized by other "ugly" personal attacks from leading scientists in the global warming world when he has simply raised questions, as any scientific colleague would, about the veracity of the data.

"Seeing all of this controversy in the news is no different than dealing with them in person," he said. "There's a lot of personal ugliness."

Taylor, who is also outspoken in his questioning of climate change theory, says he too has encountered ugliness from global warming enthusiasts, including "e-mail stalking" and "people making thinly veiled threats to physically harm me and my family." He said his opponents at public forums have refused to shake his hand or even acknowledge his presence.

Much scientific research corroborates what the CRU has been reporting, despite the missing data. "It's true that GISS (NASA’s Goddard Institute for Space Studies) and NOAA (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration) ground-based temperature reports show temperature increases similar to CRU," Taylor said.

But then the CRU scandal erupted.

Hackers uncovered e-mails between leading global warming advocates, which expressed concerns that the temperature figures from the last decade simply did not demonstrate that global warming was continuing, as theorized.

Now, some critics are questioning even the seemingly reliable data from the U.S. government.

"The GISS and NOAA reports suffer from the same reliability concerns as the CRU ground-based temperature reports," Taylor says. "And, more importantly, are similarly staffed by outspoken global warming activists who are likely engaging in the same data rigging and data hiding as CRU."

But global warming backers aren’t so sure.

"I don’t think this is a big deal," Nick Berning, director of public advocacy and media relations for Friends of the Earth, an environmental group, based in Washington D.C., said. "These are people who want to get their panties in a bunch, so they’ve gotten their panties in a bunch."

Are we living in a movie?

Today I watched all six “episodes” of the “Star Wars” saga.

Again.

Chillingly, it reminded me of what is happening today in this once great country of ours.  It had all the earmarks of how Obummer and his Marxist cronies are seizing power over a once free nation where Liberty was first and foremost.  While claiming to protect the people from emerging dangers, the soon to be emperor secretly built an enormous army of loyal clones while the people relied on a small force of jedi Knights to hold the Alliance together . . . Then he sent his knights into a battle which outcome was preplanned to reduce their numbers even more.

Today, right here on Planet Earth, we hear Obummer and his minions cry out about one “emergency” after another.  We hear him talk about how we must raise our national debt to a level that can never be brought down and back under control just to provide “health care” for a few folks who either do not want to purchase their own insurance or just do not believe that they will need health insurance right now.  We have heard him say that he needs a civilian “security force” that is just as big and well equipped as our military forces.  Yet he and congress have yet to secure our borders.

Just makes me kind of wonder.

Why can’t we see the forest for the trees?

Who I am, What I am, and Why I am . . .

As Time Marches On . . . . There Is A Glimmer Of Hope On The Horizon

I have been told that distance and time heal all wounds.

If that is the case, then how will we heal these wounds that our currant POTUS and all his Marxist cronies in the House and Senate are now inflicting on us?

The currant form of “Obama(really doesn’t)care” has been touted to be “Under 900 Billion Dollars” . . . . .

With our national deficit and national debt rising at its currant rate, before the end of the world on 12 Dec 2012 (according to the Mayan Calendar Doomsayers), we will already have been delegated a third world economy and be dependant on that most wonderful of political organizations – namely the United Nations – for all our needs with blue helmeted South African troops handing out the dole to all the hungry masses that cannot afford to feed themselves.

How do we prevent this from happening?

Sarah Palin and her “Anti-RINO Express” is how we do it.

It is time to pick your side, America, it is time to pick your side and stand up for your liberty and your country.

I will admit to all of you that I had for many years now fallen under the spell of Newt Gingrich.  No more, since I have seen him lately hobnobbing with the “Global Climate Change” people and even endorsing a “Republican In Name Only” (RINO) candidate in New York State.  That ended it for me.

I have always been an admirer of Mrs. Palin ever since she burst onto the national political arena as John’s running mate.  I admire her outspokenness and her honesty, not to mention her integrity.  I also admire her Husband for his unwavering support to his wife.

I believe that in 2010 we all should give the RINO’s that are up for re-election the boot and replace them with real conservatives, then do it again in 2012 and also replace Obama with Palin.

So far, as I can see it, she is one of the very few real conservatives left that can get the job done.

And that, my friends, is just my not-so-humble opinion.

Another Hiatus . . .

To all my faithful followers; I am going to be away from my computer until about the 24th of this month.

I will see you then.